A fine season I pick to return to the blog: a bit of Easter, a vote on 10-A, oh, and then the death of  Osama bin Laden.
The interwebs were all abuzz yesterday, and social  media machine in full flux first with the news of bin Laden’s killing,  then with reaction, and then with reaction to the reaction.
Perhaps  this falls into the category of “reaction to the reaction to the  reaction.” It’s going to get pretty meta in here real soon.
My own  reaction to the initial news was rather muted, in the way of reactions  to news that comes to you as you are making one final trip to the  bathroom before going to bed for the night. Our 17-year-old, who watched  the Facebook status avalanche just before 11:00 p.m., told me.
I  think I said, “hm, was it diabetes or did we kill him?”
He didn’t  know yet. I went to bed.
Sleep is a good first response to  ambivalence, and the news was certainly not something that I was going  to get worked up over at this point. Thus I was initially somewhat  surprised to tune in to the remarkable conversations that were taking  place yesterday on Facebook, and, I’m sure, in all kinds of other  venues.
Obviously, this is a big deal, but the emotional pitch  strikes me as completely at odds with the utter disregard most of the  American public has at this point for the fact that we are still engaged  in two wars that bin Laden launched. If we care so little for the wars  at this point, how could be care so much about the demise of the man who  spurred them on ten years ago?
Personally, I still can’t get that  worked up about the end of bin Laden, because I fear that his life is  all that has ended of the terror wars of our time.
Don’t get me  wrong. I didn’t encounter anyone who was unhappy that bin Laden had been  found, nor, come to think of it, anyone who was particularly unhappy  that he was dead. I certainly include myself in those camps, and would  put it this way, personally: I’m glad they found him, and I’m not sad  that he’s dead.
On the other hand, I certainly did not feel compelled  to dance a jig when I heard the news, nor even sing, “ding, dong the  witch is dead.” Although, to be honest, any serious pop culture fan had  to have had that song run across the internal screen at least once.  Admit it.
I know I did, and it’s not just because middle child and I  had just that afternoon been talking about how they made the tornado  effects for the Wizard of Oz.  Bin Laden has been the wicked witch to the west for a decade, the  bearded boogie man of countless terror fantasy/nightmares.
I’m not  proud of the fact that the movie ditty flitted through, but I’m not  particularly upset over it either. There is a struggle within many of us  between the thirst for something that balances the scales of justice in  the simple terms of an eye for an eye, and the recognition that such  logic leaves a whole lot of blindness in the world.
There is embedded  in that logic the myth of redemptive violence, the classic American  myth, and one that I just don’t grasp. Is it that the cleansing fire of  violence redeems what has come before? Is it the pax — not true shalom,  but rather a momentary lull — that comes after the violence that  redeems the violence?
In the midst of it all, the realist part of my  brain recognizes that bin Laden was not likely ever to be taken alive.  He had long declared his intention to die a martyr to his own twisted  cause, and the notion of police knocking on his door with an invitation  to “come out with your hands up,” is absurd. We may (or may not) be grateful that he is dead, but he was not going to be singing, “if you’ve got a warrant I guess you’re gonna come in.” If disease did not kill  him, his life was bound to end in violence.
But I cannot escape the  irony of his death at the hands of the American Empire arriving on the  second Sunday of the season of Eastertide, when Christians celebrate the  great “yes” of God over and against the violent “no” of the cross of  the Roman Empire.
I found myself wondering yesterday, if Facebook  had existed in Jesus’ time would there have been a great virtual  gnashing of teeth among the good citizens of the empire concerning the  way it dealt with its enemies such as Jesus? Would there have been  celebration among them that another threat to the pax had been removed?  Would there have been concern about the propriety of such dancing? Was  it simply business as usual, move along, nothing to see here?
To be  clear, there was nothing of Jesus in Osama bin Laden, but there is much  of Rome in us.
I don’t care about bin Laden. I’ll not mourn his  death, but I will continue to mourn our collective, violent response to  all of the death and destruction that he rained down from the skies ten  years ago. I do not believe that his death will bring an end to any of  it, but I continue to believe that there remains before us a better,  ultimately more realistic path to real peace that is paved by  nonviolence. Bin Laden’s end, in the end, was a long, but fairly simple  task of tracking down one bad guy and shooting him. What remains now, as  surely as it did ten years ago, is the far more complicated yet far  more urgent task of creating the just social order that will not give  rise to another generation of bin Ladens.
When that order dawns it  will be news worthy of dancing in the streets.
 
						
Share This
Share this post with your friends!